DIRECTION OF INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY
Introduction
1
Foreign Policy can be defined in a broad sense as the sum total of the
Principles, Aims and Objectives which a country evolves in conducting its
relations with other countries.
2. Over the period of years a broad consensus has developed on
India’s foreign policy within the country.
The Prime Minister, Mr. Vajpayee has reiterated that there will be
continuity in India’s foreign policy.
3. Analysts feel that long term planning to various facets of
foreign policy should replace adhoc dealings with emerging situations. Foreign policy should be clubbed with
security and defence for carefully planned strategies. According to analysts,
military action against other countries is an extension of that country’s
foreign policy.
Background
4. India’s first Prime Minister, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru laid down
the broad parameters of India’s foreign policy.
These were based on the twin concept of “Non-Alignment” and
“Panch-Sheel.” This policy was followed
by India during the Cold War period.
5. Analysts feel that India’s foreign
policy came under pressure during times of domestic instability as follows :
(a) The first period of domestic political instability followed
the death of Jawaharlal Nehru in 1964 and lasted till the early 1971. Sensing India’s weakness, Pakistan launched a
war in 1965.
(b) The second period of domestic instability came about in the
late seventies with the fall of the Janata Party Government. During this period the great powers tried to
constrain India’s nuclear options. It is
pointed out that during this period the great powers also extended their
influence among the smaller neighbours of India.
(c) The third
period of political instability came during the late 1980s when terrorism
gripped Punjab and Kashmir. The Mandal
and Mandir issues resulted in domestic political instability. These internal instabilities were compounded
by the collapse of the Soviet Union.
This led to increased international pressure on India on a number of
issues like Kashmir, nuclear and missile programmes and Indo-Pak relations.
6. India’s non-alignment policy was designed to not only stay
out of the blocs system but also to try and bring the blocs together on various
issues as far as possible.
7. In the Nineties, the Narasimha Rao
Government’s foreign policy was based on two parameters :-
(a) Managing the pains of transition and adjusting to the post
Cold war situation.
(b) Economic
diplomacy which acquired a high profile.
8. Gujral
Doctrine : Named after the
former Prime Minister, Mr. I.K. Gujral it was based on the following aspects :
(a) India does not ask for reciprocity with its smaller
neighbours, but gives all that it can in good faith and trust.
(b) No South Asian country will allow its territory to be used
against the interests of another country of the region.
(c) No South Asian country will interfere in the internal affairs
of another.
(d) All South Asian countries must respect each others territorial
integrity and sovereignty.
(e) All
countries will settle their dispute through peaceful bilateral negotiations.
Priorities of India’s Foreign Policy
9. India’s
Neighbours : India’s foreign
policy priorities have changed dramatically after the conduct of nuclear tests
by India and Pakistan. There is a
general apprehension among India’s neighbours on the following aspects :
(a) The prospect of a nuclear arms race between India and
Pakistan.
(b) The set-back to Sino-Indian relations which can increase
Sino-Indian tensions on one hand and Sino-Pak defence co-operation on the
other.
(c) The impact of sanctions on India and Pakistan which can have
repercussions on the economies of other neighbours from Myanmar to Maldives.
(d) The apprehension that a nuclear India
might become more assertive in its policies in relation to its smaller
neighbours.
India is responding positively to assuage these apprehensions by
engaging in regional confidence building measures and enhanced economic
co-operation with neighbours.
10. India’s Security
Doctrine : India should adopt a
policy of minimum deterrence and no-first use without reservations, according
to defence analysts. India can also accede
to the CTBT and the FMCT as they do not affect India’s security interests
adversely.
11. Asian Security
System : India should be a major
player in the balance of power system in Asia.
The rationale behind India going nuclear is to restore the balance of
power in Asia, as the symbol of power is nuclear capability, according to
analysts. Russia, China, India and Japan
are the central players in Asia.
12. Nuclear
Deterrence.
(a) Deterrence has been practised since a long time and without
nuclear deterrence there could have been a third world war, according to
analysts.
(b) India proclaims no-first-use of nuclear weapons in order to
prove to the world that under no circumstances will India use the nuclear
weapons first.
(c) India’s
draft nuclear doctrine states that India should posess nuclear weapons for
minimum nuclear deterrence.
13. Disarmament.
(a) The purpose of India going nuclear is to ensure that there is
complete nuclear disarmament and the nuclear club is wound up. India should try to al
ries
:-
(a) India’s foreign policy should also be focussed on rebuilding
relations with the developed countries like the US and Japan.
(b) India should adopt a policy of engagement/ dialogue on mutual
issues and economic co-operation.
(c) After
acquiring nuclear weapons, India should act as a matured global player
clarifying that its nuclear weapons policy has no aggressive intent, so that
the developed countries realise that India is a responsible country.
15. Pakistan and China
: India should shun all ambiguity
and adopt a clear cut policy to solve all pending issues bilaterally. It can sign a no-first-use treaty with
Pakistan and China and engage in confidence building measures with both
countries.
16. Global
Role.
(a)
India represents one-sixth of humanity and should therefore
play an important role in global affairs
(b)
India should pursue a foreign policy which will address all
its global interests.
(c)
There has to be an appropriate balance between regional
interests and global interests.
Government’s
Focus on Foreign Policy
17. Dialogue
with Global Interlocutors.
(a) India has expressed its readiness to join the CTBT but wants
the removal of curbs on the transfer of sophisticated technologies.
(b) India also wants the industrialised nations not to insist on
fullscope safeguard s, while agreeing to help it build nuclear power reactors
to meet the country’s large requirements of power.
(c) India has
shown flexibility to open various economic sectors to foreign investors.
18. India’s Security
Concerns. Analysts feel that
India’s security concerns are better appreciated now than before. The statements of senior US State Department
are cited in support of this assessment.
19.
China. India is keen to pursue the ongoing dialogue
on the boundary issue and enhance the confidence-building measures in the
border region.
20.
Russia. India is more than happy with its relations
with Russia. This is evident from the
co-operation in the defence field, the signing of the agreement on the
installation of nuclear power reactors etc with Russia. The visit of Russian Presigent Putin to India
had given added impetus to Indo-Russion relation. A total of 11 MOUs were
signed during his visit.
Criticism
of the Government’s Foreign Policy
21.
The Government has done little to rebuild consensus on foreign policy
that it has destroyed and has done virtually nothing to contain the political,
diplomatic and economic fallout of the nuclear tests, according to critics.
This perception has changed considerably after the exchage of visits by heads
of state of USA & India and Putin’s visits to India.
22.
Different people in different positions in the government have been
speaking in different voices, according to critics. The good work done by the Gujral Doctrine has
been destroyed and the neighbours have become more apprehensive now. Nowadays the constituents of NDA government
are treading more carefully.
23.
Relations with China which were built painstakingly have been undone in
the most irresponsible manner by the defence minister according to
critics. Relations now are on an up
swing.
24. Relations with Pakistan have also received a setback after the
Kargil misadventure.
25. The growing relations with the US did receive a set-back after
the nuclear tests and the Government has not done anything substantial to keep
the Indo-US relations on an even keel, according to critics. However, with the visits of President Clinton
and Vajpayee have now tilted the US
towards India.
26. Finally, some critics feel that the Government has no strategy
and plan of action in pursuing the goals of foreign policy.
Conclusion
27. By choosing to prove its nuclear capability, India has chosen
the hard road to world status, according to analysts. The world will view India differently now, it
will get more respect but there will also be a fierce countervailing force.
28. An overwhelming number of developing nations have supported
the nuclear tests by India but only a few developed nations have shown
understanding of India’s position initially.
29. The unipolar concept of the world advocated by the US has been
challenged and the commitment to a multipolar world has been underlined.
30. Finally,with a huge population and large potential, India has
the resilience to meet the new challenges.
India still stands for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons from
the world. India needs to convey its
stand to the world through a moderate and diplomatically mature foreign
policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment