MYANMAR
State
Peace and Development Council (SPDC)
1. On November 15, 1997, the ruling military junta of Myanmar
announced that the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) was
dissolved and in its place the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) was
constituted.
2. The SPDC was made up of four Government Heads and 15
commanders of various military regions of Myanmar and could represent a consolidation
of power of top military leaders, according to analysts.
3. The leaders at the Head of the Council are the chairman of
SLORC, Sr Gen. Than Shwe, Gen. Maung Aye, SLORC
secretary one Kihn Nyut, head of military intelligence and SLORC secretary two, Gen. Tin Oo.
4. At the second level, the functional Government has been
reconstituted with about 40 Ministries, many of them new faces and the second
rung of regional commanders from the armed forces.
5. Objectives.
To build a new modern and developed nation and to usher in a disciplined
flourishing democracy.
6. Critics have dismissed these changes as cosmetic and making
little difference either to the people or to the process of restoring
democracy.
7. The changes came at a time when the military Government seem
to harden its stance against pro-democracy leaders, particularly Ms. Aung San
Suu Kyi of the National League for Democracy (NLD).
Background
8. Myanmar formerly known as Burma has been ruled by the
military Government since 1988. The military crushed the protests and
recaptured power by setting up the State Law and Order Restoration Council
(SLORC). The brutal suppression of
democratic uprisings resulted in the death of thousands of people.
9. Democratic elections were held by the SLORC in1990. The National League for Democracy (NLD) of
the dissident leader Ms. Suu Kyi, won the election capturing 392 of the 485
seats. However, the military junta could
not bear to see the verdict and ordered the annulling of the verdict. Ms. Suu Kyi and hundereds of political
activists were arrested.
10. In 1993, the SLORC organised a Constitutional Convention to
draw up guidelines for a new Constitution.
However, the elected members were in minority in the convention with 85
per cent of the 702 delegates being handpicked by SLORC.
11. The purpose of the Convention was to give the military a
permanent guiding role in the Government.
Thus, the military Government wanted its leading role in the future of
politics in Mynmar to be enshrined in the Constitution.
12. Ms. Suu Kyi was freed by SLORC in July 1995. The confrontation between Ms. Suu Kyi and the military has been rising ever
since. Ms. Suu Kyi has demanded that the
Partliament elected in 1990 should be called into session. The SLORC
has responded by saying that the term of those elected has already
expired.
13. The NLD has rejected the participation of the military in any
future Government. It was emphasised
that the armed forces should be an honourable institution which should have the
goal of defending the nation and helping bring back democracy to Myanmar.
14. In May 1997, the US imposed unilateral investment sanctions on
Myanmar. Under the measures, intended to
help in the restorationof democracy, US firms will be barred from making fresh
investments in Myanmar.
15. Myanmar was also admitted as a full member of ASEAN (Association of South-East Asian Nations) in
1997.
16. In December 1997, Myanmar was also admitted in the trade and
business bloc of nations along the Bay of Bengal. The Bangladesh-India-Sri
Lanka-Thailand Economic Co-operation (BISTEC) grouping has being renamed
BIMSTEC to accommodate Myanmar.
Indo-Myanmar
Relations
17. Mynamar shares 1600 km
border and is an important neighbour of India because its utility as a gateway
to the ASEAN and its strategic
location. The country has long remained
a haven for the insurgents in the North-East of India.
18. India appears to be caught in a bind on dealing with Myanmar,
according to analysts. India as the
largest democracy in the world cannot ignore the Pro-democracy struggle by Ms.
Aung Suu Kyi. At the same time India
needs cordial relations with Myanmar to tackle the North-East insurgency.
19. The shift in India’s position came during the Narasimha Rao
period when the Government indicated that it was reluctant to take up the
pro-democracy issue in a big way.
20. The change in India’s attitude was reciprocated by the SLORC
and insubsequent years, the two sides held regular meetings on security-related
matters. Mynamar also co-operated with India on North-East insurgents.
21. India’s policy on Myanmar has been criticised as being
short-sighted. Critics want India to
actively join the international effort to isolate SLORC and pave the way for
democracy.
22.
Analysts feel Government of
India should engage the military junta in Myanmar in trade-cum-strategic talks
but simultaneously pile pressure on the regime to return the country to the
democratic path.
23. Visits Army chief Gen VP Malik and home secretary
Kamal Pande visited Myanmar. This along
with import of 50,000 tonnes of rice from Myanmar have set the stage for the
first high level, week long visit from Myanmar in mid Nov 2000. The saliant points of the visit are :-
(a)
Myanmar delegation was headed by Gen Maung Aye, vice Chairman of the
ruling SDPC (No2 man). He is the most
senior govt member to visit since SDPC took over in 1988.
(b)
India will extend a credit loan of $15 million for Myanmar to purchase
Indian capital goods.
(c)
India & Myanmar to co-ordinate their activities to control
militency in the North East by joint patroling and joint manning of the BOPs.
No comments:
Post a Comment